There are two different methods of counting, each performing a different function. When learning a new musical idea, the count is dependant upon the notes within that musical idea, e.g.:
This is a standard counting system.
Once comfortable, many repetitions of the musical idea are needed in order to master it. Practice is basically a two part process:
Learning requires standard counting. Repetition requires repetition counting.
Repetition counting, as the name suggests, is a counting system designed to count each repetition of a musical idea. When counting to one hundred there are three differences between repetition counting and the regular numeric counting system:
Each of these changes reduces syllables. The reduction in syllables facilitates greater speed and rhythm when counting. Counting thirty bars of * time using the repetition counting system would look like this:
The following features can be seen from the previous text:
Counting using one syllable per beat (quarter note) serves two functions:
Using a maximum of two syllables for all number counts up to one hundred (the one hundredth bar would be counted ) allows this counting system usage with any time signature, e.g., % , ^ * etc.
Counting beyond one hundred is impossible without using a lot of syllables per number count. Bear in mind, in * time at a tempo of 60 BPM, counting one hundred repetitions would take 6.666 minutes. However, if multiple lots of one hundred repetitions is required, use the same counting system but keep track of each group of one hundred reps (repetitions) by hitting a different sound source, e.g.:
The repetition counting system has the following advantages: